Caleb's Blog
Archives
April 2000May 2000June 2000August 2000September 2000December 2000January 2001February 2001March 2001April 2001May 2001June 2001July 2001August 2001September 2001November 2001January 2002February 2002March 2002May 2002June 2002August 2002September 2002October 2002November 2002January 2003February 2003March 2003April 2003May 2003July 2003August 2003September 2003October 2003November 2003December 2003January 2004February 2004March 2004April 2004May 2004June 2004July 2004August 2004September 2004October 2004November 2004January 2005February 2005April 2005May 2005June 2005August 2005September 2005October 2005November 2005March 2006April 2006May 2006June 2006July 2006August 2006December 2006January 2007February 2007March 2007July 2007
Happier every day
Sad waves in sets
Time missed
Look around
See where I'm found
Waking up
Unbound
Changeful stress
Evolutive growing pains
Chipping away at bad habits
Sore mind muscles
Feeling good can feel bad
At first
Interestingly I made the same mistakes I make in Quake. I moved too much, got to too wrapped up in the adrenaline rush and didn't think clearly. Mostly I just didn't keep my head down enough.
I did have a Matrix moment though. In one of my many moving too much adrenaline rushes through the scraggly chaparral terrain, a well camoed enemy team member suddenly stood up about 10 ft from me and shot. I jumped/fell backwards and shot before I hit the ground hard on my back. His gun jammed and I somehow hit him on the knee, leaving a huge welt.
Luckily we were pitted against a mellow bunch of newbies out for a birthday party. Later in the morning a platoon of off duty cops and military heads showed up. They were scary serious and big, both in the stomachs and muscles. Then the regulars showed up. Even more battle fantasized out. Camo face netting, 1000 round speed loaders, flack jackets, attitudes, large bellies. At first they were intimidating, but after playing a few rounds it occurred to me that they presented a bigger slower target in the end and perhaps wouldn't be anything special if you got over the psychology of it all.
The people I played with who had done it before said they'd seen a slight bodied young man dressed in hunter orange consistently kick ass, so there you go...
Idea via Jared S.: It’s not how best to teach; it’s what to learn.
Thus not the specific pedagogy but more what you choose to try and teach. Is it the old standard of math, English, history, or is it psychology (history?), computers (science?), business networking (psychology), community building, and personal economics (math), research writing (English?).
If you teach no old style rote math, what happens to a kid at 18 who wants to be a physicist? Can they, will they, learn pre-algebra at 18 in order to do that, or will it be too hard at that age? And how do you test this idea? You can’t isolate students and not teach them things depending on your theories, can you? Is that what charter schools are trying to do? Perhaps trying, but charter schools are dependant on standardized state scores, which ask for a set of old school knowledge. Perhaps the School Around Us (<30 student elementary and junior high, holistic, consensus run school) with its consensus framework is different enough to test. What about schools that study the Koran only?
Or does it even matter what you teach, as long as you learn how to learn? And what predetermined factors such as families, reading, culture, etc. cancel out large chunks of school influence anyway?
But the point of Jared’s idea is this. We are pretty good natural teachers and we train well to be better ones. But what to teach? That is an interesting question.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________